Objectively speaking, the most serious aspect of the matter is that the leak documentation openly contradicts many public statements made by Google executives. To make matters worse, some of these statements discrit those professionals who sought to refute certain assumptions about Google’s internal workings. Of course, since he who laughs last laughs best, this data leak made it clear who was telling (or ducing) the truth.
On the other hand, the seriousness of
The matter lies in the deception suffer by whatsapp number list those of us dicat to SEO. Certainly, the uncertainty surrounding many of the measures appli by the search engine serves to mislead spammers and guarantee the quality of the pages. However, the leak documents demonstrate that, sometimes, the weight of a brand can overshadow quality. They also demonstrate that positioning isn’t as ” organic ” as one might assume. And that it depends less on the skill of an SEO professional than on what Google considers to be too many or too few clicks .
In any case, the leak information serves to confirm a
Trend that Google and other browsers have been adopting in recent years: producing for the user , not for a robot. Just look at the elements best phoenix social media agencies that contribute to SERP positioning. User experience and navigability, fonts that are easy to read, quality content that matches the search query…
The focus is on what the user nes . And satisfactorily addressing that ne is the most organic measure one can take to rank well these days. After all, quality clicks aren’t provid by Google (or maybe they are, but we can’t say for sure), but by those who browse the web.
None of this is new, nor does it represent a taiwan lists major change for those who have been applying user experience -orient SEO practices in their production . In short: the data leak from the Google Search API content store confirm (among other things) that the consumer is the key . But we already knew that.